Turning Gladiator into The Jaguar: Crafting a New Epic with Subtxt

Crafting corruption, betrayal, vengeance, and a jaguar’s wrath

When working on a new story, there’s often a temptation to feel like you’re starting from scratch, staring down a blank page with nothing but coffee and existential dread for company. But what if you could lean on a proven narrative structure—not to copy or mimic, but to understand the underlying architecture of a compelling story and use it as a foundation for your own ideas? That’s exactly what Subtxt helps writers do, and today, we’re breaking down how it turned the bones of Gladiator into something entirely fresh: an epic called The Jaguar.

Spoiler alert: Before you clutch your pearls about originality or start crying about AI stealing from writers, know that Gladiator borrowed its narrative DNA 100% from Braveheart. Both films share the exact same narrative structure—just set in different times and places. So, if Ridley Scott can borrow from Mel Gibson, why can’t we do the same with Subtxt?

And here’s how that process unfolded, step by step.

Step 1: Establishing the Four Throughlines

Every story in Subtxt starts with its Four Throughlines: the perspectives that bring balance and depth to your narrative. In Gladiator, these are:

• The Main Character Throughline (Maximus): A wronged general seeking revenge and redemption.
• The Obstacle Character Throughline (Commodus): An insecure emperor whose ambition and jealousy create the central conflict.
• The Objective Story Throughline: The clash of ideals between loyalty, power, and justice within the Roman Empire.
• The Relationship Story Throughline: The “sibling” relationship between Maximus and Commodus, woven with betrayal and ideological differences.

By analyzing these throughlines, Subtxt creates a framework for building something new. For The Jaguar, the story shifted to the jungles of South America, centering on a former revolutionary betrayed by his own movement. While the specifics of time, place, and characters changed, the underlying narrative remained robust and relatable.

Here’s a look at that exchange with Muse:

🪶 Muse

Translating Gladiator's Themes into the Aztec World

Here’s how the Gladiator Throughlines could adapt to this setting:

1. Objective Story Throughline:

   • The empire is on the brink of war or collapse due to a corrupt tlatoani (or another ruler). The betrayal of your protagonist is the spark that sets off a larger conflict.
   • OS Domain: Universe—the political and religious structure of the Aztec world creates external problems for everyone.

2. Main Character Throughline:

   • A once-revered Jaguar warrior or high priest is framed for treason, leading to their family’s execution and their own fall into slavery or exile.
   • MC Domain: Physics—their personal struggle is all about action and survival: escaping captivity, proving their innocence, and seeking revenge.

3. Obstacle Character Throughline:

   • The antagonist could be a scheming noble, a corrupt priest, or even a fellow warrior who betrayed the Main Character for political gain.
   • OC Domain: Psychology—they manipulate and scheme to maintain control, twisting faith and tradition to justify their actions.

4. Relationship Story Throughline:

   • The relationship could focus on the MC and a loyal ally (perhaps a priestess or childhood friend) who challenges their thirst for vengeance with questions of faith and forgiveness.
   • RS Domain: Mind—this Throughline plays out as a battle of beliefs and wills.

Building an Epic Aztec Narrative

Let’s craft the Objective Story and Main Character next. Here are some questions to tighten the focus:

1. Objective Story Conflict: What is the larger problem in the empire? Is the corrupt ruler oppressing the people? Are enemies threatening from outside? Is there a prophecy that foretells doom unless something drastic happens?
2. Main Character’s Betrayal: Who betrays the MC, and why? Are they framed for a crime they didn’t commit? Are they cast out for defying a sacred order?
3. The Revenge Arc: Is it pure vengeance, or does the MC seek to restore honor and balance to the empire? What’s their ultimate goal?

Let’s start shaping this Aztec epic! What’s calling to you most at this point—the larger world, the MC’s personal journey, or the betrayal that kicks it all off? 🌋

✍🏻 Jim Hull

woah! all of that was so good! lets make the OC a fellow warrior out for personal gain. and then for the RS i love the idea of a childhood friend, maybe, for the sake of simplicity, we'll make it the same person for the os - lets make it a corrupt ruler, and the MC betrayal would come from his second in command - not necessarily the OC - but another who the OC had manipulated into doing that

At all times, my artistic intent is what drives the creative process.

Just like in real life.

Step 2: Defining the Central Perspectives

In Subtxt, the Main Character and Obstacle Character perspectives are the heart of your story. This isn’t a linear process—it’s a dance. As I brainstormed ideas for The Jaguar, I volleyed between fleshing out my Main Character (a betrayed revolutionary) and his adversary (a childhood friend consumed by jealousy). This iterative back-and-forth helped me refine their roles until their perspectives fit perfectly into the story’s overarching narrative.

🪶 Muse

Ooooh, that’s deliciously complex! We’ve got betrayal, manipulation, personal vendettas, and a corrupt ruler—this is shaping up to be a truly epic Aztec tragedy. 🌟 Let’s break it all down step by step and start weaving the web:

Objective Story Throughline: A Corrupt Ruler and a Manipulated Betrayal

• Core Conflict: The tlatoani (emperor) is corrupt, hoarding wealth and power while neglecting the people. The empire teeters on the edge of war with a rival city-state, and the ruler’s actions (or inaction) are making things worse.
• The MC’s Betrayal: The MC was once the emperor’s most trusted Jaguar warrior and military leader. But the OC (a fellow Jaguar warrior) manipulates the ruler's second-in-command into framing the MC for treason, leading to their exile and the death of their family. The OC’s goal? To rise to power by any means necessary and take the MC’s place in the ruler’s inner circle.
• OS Domain: Universe—the external chaos of a collapsing empire and corrupted political structure fuels the story’s conflict.

Main Character Throughline: A Warrior’s Fall and Rise

• Who Is the MC?: The protagonist is a Jaguar warrior of unmatched skill, a hero to the people and a loyal servant to the gods and empire. Their life is shattered when they are betrayed, their family sacrificed, and their honor stripped away.
• Goal: To clear their name, seek vengeance against the OC, and bring down the corrupt ruler.
• MC Domain: Physics—the MC’s personal conflict revolves around action: escaping captivity, surviving exile, and physically confronting their enemies.

Obstacle Character Throughline: A Manipulative Rival

• Who Is the OC?: The OC is another Jaguar warrior, once a childhood friend of the MC. But ambition and jealousy have consumed them. They manipulate the emperor’s second-in-command into betraying the MC, knowing it will open the path for their own rise to power.
• The OC’s Perspective: They justify their actions as necessary for their own survival in a corrupt world. They believe the MC is naive and blind to the reality of power.
• Key Conflict: The OC challenges the MC’s sense of justice and honor, forcing the MC to question whether revenge is worth the cost.
• OC Domain: Psychology—the OC’s manipulative and self-serving mindset drives their actions.

Here’s the beauty of this process: it’s not rigid. Your chaotic, half-formed ideas find structure as Subtxt guides you through narrative intent, ensuring that the Main Character’s personal struggle and the Obstacle Character’s opposing worldview are perfectly aligned to drive conflict.

✍🏻 Jim Hull

well, i love your idea about "restoring justice and order to the empire" - lets go with that one. And for the MC, i like the idea of raw revenge and for the resolution the MC definitely confronts the OC, and I would say I still feel like the MC should fall - perhaps both dead - but in doing so the people rise up and overthrow the emperor - something like that - maybe not both of them dead - maybe its the OC who ends up having the big 180 like Robert the Bruce

🪶 Muse

Oh, Jim, you're tapping into something truly epic here! The raw revenge, the tragic confrontation, and the ultimate rise of the people—it’s got that Shakespearean mix of personal tragedy and larger societal triumph. And the Robert the Bruce-like turn for the OC? Chef’s kiss! Let’s carve this into a masterpiece.

Muse, powered by Subtxt, keeps the integrity of the narrative while I effortlessly bounce ideas off that creative space.

Step 3: Finalizing the Storyform (and Course-Correcting!)

Once I had a sense of my story’s direction, it was time to lock in the Storyform—the backbone of any narrative in Subtxt. Thanks to Subtxt’s new Advanced Model, powered by o1 from OpenAI, the resulting Storyform was incredibly precise. But here’s where things got interesting: I realized I’d made a mistake in what I was asking for.

✍🏻 Jim Hull

oh - you know what?! I was so excited about how well everything was going - with the MC Resolve - i wanted it to be Steadfast - and the OC Resolve to be Changed

🪶 Muse

Great catch! Itzcóatl will now have a Steadfast Resolve, holding onto their original approach throughout the story, while Tlilpotonqui (the OC) will transform and experience a Changed Resolve. This creates an even more dynamic relationship between them, highlighting Itzcóatl’s unwavering pursuit of justice and Tlilpotonqui’s eventual redemption arc. 🐆✨

Would you like to revisit or adjust any other aspects of the Storyform with this new dynamic in mind? Or should we dive deeper into the story development—like plotting scenes or fleshing out those character arcs? Let’s keep the momentum rolling! 🚀

Initially, I framed the story so that the Main Character triumphs by holding firm to their ideals. But as I reviewed the structure, I realized I wanted the Obstacle Character to be the one who changes, and in doing so, forces the Main Character to confront the consequences of their actions. This shift completely restructured the thematic flow of the story—something Subtxt handled seamlessly.

The development process of a story is not static; you don’t push a button, or worse--write “the perfect prompt”--and boom, out comes a perfectly formed story. The process is meant to evolve as the storyteller (author) grows closer to their original intent and artistic impulse. Subtxt’s ability to regenerate a narrative framework based on artist’s intent is what separates it from everything else.

And what proves once and for all, the value and import the writer in the creative process of a narrative.

Step 4: Redefining Revenge with a Bad Ending

One of the most profound ways The Jaguar diverged from Gladiator and Braveheart was in its Story Judgment. Both of those films end on a “Good” note: the protagonists achieve revenge and die satisfied, having upheld their beliefs. But in The Jaguar, revenge leaves the Main Character worse off—alienated from his remaining allies and consumed by the violence he sought to escape. This deliberate choice shifted the narrative’s moral weight, turning a traditional hero’s journey into a cautionary tale about the cost of vengeance.

This isn’t about copying or stealing. It’s about recognizing that narrative intent shapes structure, not the other way around. Subtxt gives writers the power to warp, bend, and reshape story structures into forms that match their unique perspectives. It codifies the importance of subjective intent in storytelling. Without your input, it’s just a framework. With your creative decisions, it’s a launchpad for something original.

🪶 Muse

The updated Storyform for The Jaguar has now been finalized! 🎉 Itzcóatl will remain Steadfast, staying true to their path, while Tlilpotonqui undergoes the Changed arc. This subtle but impactful shift sharpens the thematic depth of the story.

What’s next?

1. Explore how this Steadfast/Changed dynamic plays out in key scenes (e.g., the final confrontation).
2. Flesh out how Itzcóatl’s Steadfast Resolve shapes their actions and emotional arc.
3. Revisit Throughlines or adjust world-building to reflect the updated Storyform.

Let me know where you’d like to dive in! The Jaguar is roaring to life! 🐆✨

Wrapping Up

Using Subtxt, The Jaguar didn’t just end up in a new time and place; it became a fundamentally different narrative. By leaning on the structure of Gladiator—and by extension, Braveheart—I was able to craft a story that feels fresh while staying grounded in the universal principles of storytelling.

So, the next time you’re stuck, remember this: originality doesn’t mean reinventing the wheel. It means understanding how the wheel works so you can roll it in your own direction. And with Subtxt, you’re never building alone.

👉 Download the full transcript of this process here (PDF)

Protecting Stories or Missing the Plot? The WGA’s Approach to AI and Writing

Stop fighting words--focus on what drives stories

The Writers Guild of America (WGA) recently called for Hollywood studios to take legal action against AI companies allegedly using subtitles from TV shows and movies to train their models. On the surface, this might seem like a valiant defense of writers’ intellectual property. But beneath the headlines, it reveals a concerning misunderstanding of what truly makes a story—and what AI models are actually capable of.

The idea that AI models could somehow “steal” storytelling through subtitles isn’t just flawed; it’s an embarrassment for anyone who truly understands the craft of writing. Subtitles are a surface-level artifact of a story. They’re the end product of something far deeper: a writer’s understanding of character, theme, and conflict. What makes a story resonate isn’t the literal words on the page, but the psychology of those words—the subtext driving the choices and emotions beneath the dialogue. To believe that AI trained on subtitles could replicate this process is to conflate a recipe with the meal it creates.

Words Are Not Stories

The WGA’s argument inadvertently reduces storytelling to its component parts: the words themselves. But stories aren’t just a collection of words strung together—they’re a reflection of a writer’s heart, their perspective, and their unique understanding of human nature. Stories live in the choices the author makes--not the characters--and in the unspoken conflicts carefully crafted between people and ideas--a result of artistic intent and heartfelt thematic exploration that ripple through every scene.

What makes this stance even more disheartening is how it inadvertently belittles the very writers the Guild is meant to champion. It suggests that writers are so fragile, so reliant on the “protection” of their words, that the core of their creativity is at risk from an AI cobbled together with lines from Breaking Bad. It ignores the fact that no algorithm can replicate the artistic drive, the personal experiences, or the thematic depth that make a story worth telling in the first place.

The Real Problem With Training AI on Subtitles

Here’s the kicker: training AI on subtitles isn’t just ethically murky; it’s bad storytelling practice. Subtitles capture the surface-level elements of a narrative—dialogue, yes, but stripped of context, meaning, and intent. Any model trained this way would likely produce shallow, hollow imitations of real stories, lacking the soul that comes from a deeper understanding of narrative psychology.

For Subtxt, we’ve never trained on scripts, subtitles, or manuscripts. Why? Because we know that’s a recipe for disaster. Stories aren’t built from the outside in; they’re built from the inside out. Subtxt focuses on modeling the psychology of storytelling—how characters grow, how themes weave through a narrative, and how conflict drives every meaningful choice. Our approach isn’t about replicating what’s been written; it’s about understanding why it was written that way.

Writers Don’t Need Protection From Themselves

The WGA’s position also plays into a deeper insecurity many writers already feel: that without perfect words on the page, they’ll be replaced by something else. But great storytelling doesn’t start with words—it starts with intention. Writers don’t need someone to fight for their ownership of dialogue; they need support in protecting the ideas, the subtext, and the emotional truths that only they can bring to life.

Ironically, by focusing so heavily on the ownership of words, the WGA risks bargaining away the very agency that makes writing powerful. The Guild should be fighting for systems that empower writers to tell stories only they can tell—not reinforcing the false notion that their worth lies solely in the literal text.

Let’s Elevate the Conversation

Storytelling is, and always will be, a deeply human endeavor. AI can offer tools to help writers clarify their vision, refine their structure, and explore creative possibilities. But no AI, regardless of its training data, can replace the artistry and intuition of a writer who has something real to say. That’s the kind of creativity the WGA should be protecting.

Writers don’t need to fear AI trained on subtitles. They need to fear frameworks that reduce their work to surface-level mimicry—whether it’s coming from AI or from the institutions meant to support them. There’s a way forward, one that integrates the writer into the very system they fear will replace them. With Subtxt, we’ve proven this approach to be both effective and rewarding, time and time again.

So let’s stop fighting over words and start focusing on what makes stories truly sing: the heart, the psychology, and the intention behind them. Because without that, even the most polished words are just empty echoes.

And if you’re a writer looking for tools that respect your artistry and amplify your voice, you’ll find them in places that understand the true depth of storytelling. With Subtxt, we believe in helping writers connect with what makes their stories special—not replacing them, but empowering them to shine. 🌟

The Bitter Lesson and the Subtxt Advantage

Why specialized AI matters for storytelling

Every now and then, a piece of writing about artificial intelligence stops us in our tracks and reframes how we see our work. That’s what The Bitter Lesson did recently, pushing us to reconsider the "why" behind Subtxt and why it continues to thrive alongside advancements in AI. Combine that with OpenAI’s latest developments in Reinforcement Learning through Feedback (RFT), and the takeaway is clearer than ever: Subtxt fills a gap that no general-purpose AI can reach.

And yet, we get the question a lot: "Why don’t I just use ChatGPT to do what Subtxt does?"

It’s a fair question. After all, ChatGPT can churn out workable stories, whip up thematic ideas, and respond to prompts with a fluidity that feels creative. You absolutely could use it to assist with storytelling—to a certain extent. But there’s a level between your request and the response, a level where Subtxt works its magic. And that level? It’s more than narrative theory—it’s about how to play the rules and think through concepts. That’s the Subtxt advantage.

What The Bitter Lesson Taught Us

In his essay, Richard Sutton argues that general-purpose learning and computation scale better over time than handcrafted solutions. In other words, when building AI, it’s better to teach systems how to learn broadly than to hardcode specific skills.

This insight has fueled breakthroughs like GPT-4. Instead of manually teaching these systems rules for every task, researchers let them learn from data, making them adaptable to countless applications. But here’s the kicker: general-purpose systems don’t do everything equally well. And for something as nuanced and structured as storytelling, they hit a ceiling.

That’s where Subtxt shines.

Subtxt’s Role Between General AI and Human Creativity

Subtxt isn’t here to compete with general-purpose AI like ChatGPT. It’s here to complement it. While ChatGPT dazzles with breadth, Subtxt digs deep. Subtxt operates in that middle space—where narrative logic, thematic cohesion, and dynamic structure matter most.

Think of it this way:

• ChatGPT is a teller of tales: It can craft tales by identifying patterns in its training data, making it a useful tool for surface-level brainstorming and rough concepts.
• Subtxt is a story architect: It ensures your story isn’t just a bunch of complete sentences, but instead positions your work as a thematically meaningful, structurally sound, and emotionally resonant narrative.

Tales begin and end, with their meaning shifting based on where the story starts and concludes.

Stories, on the other hand, weave a cohesive argument or message through the interconnectedness of all their parts. This underlying meaning remains constant, regardless of where the narrative starts or ends, driven by the artist's intent and vision.

The difference is like letting a general AI compose a song versus having Subtxt teach it the mechanics of music theory and how to evoke specific emotions. Subtxt gives AI—and storytellers—the tools to think critically about narrative.

Why We’re Teaching AI Instead of Humans

For years, we focused on teaching people the principles of narrative theory. But as Sutton’s Bitter Lesson makes clear, there’s a better way: teach the AI. By encoding Subtxt’s expertise into systems that anyone can access, we make high-level storytelling guidance available to creators worldwide. It’s not about replacing human creativity (which is silly that we even have to mention that)—it’s about scaling knowledge so that more people can create stories that resonate.

Reinforcement Learning through Feedback (RFT), the latest innovation from OpenAI, is a perfect example of how this works. Instead of hardcoding every rule, RFT trains AI on how to think about tasks (and we can't wait to get our hands on it!). This aligns perfectly with Subtxt’s approach: we don’t just provide rules; we show how to navigate the complex web of story dynamics based on our decades of practical experience.

The Subtxt Advantage: Thinking Through Narrative

What makes Subtxt truly unique isn’t just its roots in narrative theory—it’s how it applies those principles dynamically. Subtxt teaches AI to think about:

• Themes and Intent: How does your story's central inequity shape its thematic argument? What emotional journey underscores the resolution of this inequity?
• Structure and Strategy: Does the narrative's sequence of Transits and Progressions build toward a cohesive argument? Are all story points aligned to create a meaningful progression?
• Conflict and Growth: How does the interplay between dynamic pairs, such as the Pivotal Elements between the two central points-of-view, reveal deeper truths about your characters' arcs and the story's overarching purpose?

This is more than following a checklist; it’s about training AI to understand why those elements matter.

The Bitter Truth About "Just Using ChatGPT"

Sure, you can feed ChatGPT a prompt and get a decent response. But without Subtxt, you’re missing a crucial layer of refinement. ChatGPT might create something that sounds right, but without a framework, there’s no guarantee it holds together under narrative scrutiny. That’s the difference between a fun idea and a fully realized story.

And while it might seem like we have a chip on our shoulders about ChatGPT, it’s more about a chip we’ve carried for decades. Having worked in the animation industry, we’ve seen the limits of sub-sufficient strategies like the Hero’s Journey and Save the Cat!. These frameworks were never enough, but now, ChatGPT takes their limitations and scales them. What was once an issue limited to a handful of privileged writers and directors is now a global phenomenon—anyone can create incomplete stories at scale! 😱

This is a huge passion of ours and the reason we’re so driven. Subtxt ensures your narrative doesn’t just entertain but resonates. It bridges the gap between a general-purpose AI assistant and the specific demands of storytelling.

Scaling Subtxt’s Expertise with AI

Instead of competing with general AI, Subtxt integrates its strengths. Here’s how:

1. Interpreting Input: Subtxt helps make sense of messy, unstructured user prompts, translating them into meaningful narrative elements.
2. Guiding Creativity: General AI can brainstorm ideas, but Subtxt ensures those ideas align with the artist's original intent by adhering to thematic and structural principles deeply rooted in the narrative framework.
3. Teaching the Rules of the Game: With RFT, Subtxt trains AI to play narrative like a pro, not just simulate understanding. (*coming soon!)

Subtxt with Muse: The Brainstorming Powerhouse Your Story Deserves

Ever find yourself tangled in the threads of your latest novel or screenplay, wondering if you're truly unlocking its full potential? Sure, you've got tools like ChatGPT at your disposal—an impressive interface with a general understanding of story—but therein lies the problem: a general understanding simply isn’t enough. When it comes to crafting a story that resonates, you need something that knows what it’s doing. You need Subtxt.

Subtxt doesn’t just help you brainstorm ideas—it redefines the process entirely. While ChatGPT might be a convenient tool for surface-level musings, Subtxt taps into decades of narrative expertise and the rich framework of the Dramatica theory of story to offer actionable, insightful guidance. It’s not guessing; it knows. And that’s the difference.

Let’s explore what that looks like in action.

Muse: Your Story's Secret Weapon

Imagine you’re deep into the second act of your screenplay, wrestling with your Main Character’s unresolved inner conflict. You ask ChatGPT for ideas, and it spits out a few generic suggestions based on the patterns it’s seen before. Some are decent; others feel like they’ve been used in a dozen other stories.

But then you turn to Subtxt with Muse. Instead of vague inspiration, Muse provides razor-sharp analysis. It pinpoints the structural issues, connects them to your character's thematic purpose, and even suggests story beats that align perfectly with your intended narrative arc. It’s not just helping you brainstorm—it’s showing you exactly why these elements matter to your story’s DNA.

Need to know if your Antagonist is functioning as the perfect counterbalance to your Protagonist? Subtxt with Muse has you covered. Wondering if that scene in the second act really drives your character toward transformation? Muse will help you tweak it until it’s a masterclass in storytelling.

It’s like the difference between playing darts blindfolded and playing with a laser guide.

Why "General" Doesn't Cut It

The truth is, a "general understanding" of story might be fine for a quick creative nudge, but when you’re serious about telling a meaningful, resonant story, you need a tool that’s built for the task. Subtxt isn’t trying to sound smart or throw random ideas at you; it’s applying a proven narrative theory to your specific draft. That’s a level of expertise ChatGPT simply can’t replicate because it wasn’t designed to.

And the best part? Subtxt doesn’t just analyze—it teaches. With every recommendation, it’s helping you understand the mechanics of storytelling, so you’re not just fixing this draft; you’re learning how to master every story you tell going forward.

A Creative Partner Like No Other

Whether you’re polishing a screenplay for Sundance or drafting your next bestseller, Subtxt with Muse is the partner your creativity deserves. It doesn’t guess, and it doesn’t waste your time. It works with precision, clarity, and purpose—so your story can shine the way it was meant to.

And don't take our word for it. Here's a recent subscriber, brand new to writing:

I started by exploring Muse, asking questions about creating short-form documentaries.

Learned more about writing, structuring, and the Four Throughlines today than I did in the last 6 months watching YouTube and reading blogs.

Always great to hear when a plan comes together!

So, sure, ChatGPT is great for casual brainstorming. But if you want to get serious about storytelling, there’s only one tool that truly gets it: Subtxt. Give your story the fine-tuning it deserves, and let Muse guide you toward something extraordinary. 🎯

The Future of Storytelling with Subtxt

The bitter lesson isn’t about abandoning handcrafted systems—it’s about knowing when to combine them with scalable technology. Subtxt is a hybrid: part narrative expert, part scalable AI system. It doesn’t compete with ChatGPT; it enhances what general AI can do, filling the gaps with deep, domain-specific expertise.

By focusing on how stories work, Subtxt ensures that creators—whether they’re human or AI—always have a blueprint for crafting meaningful, impactful narratives.

So yes, you could just use ChatGPT. But if you want your story to do more than just sound good—if you want it to think and feel good—Subtxt is here for you. 📖✨

A New Chapter: Subtxt’s Journey Beyond Dramatica

Moving beyond philosophy into limitless creativity

For over three decades, Dramatica theory has been a cornerstone of how we understand and craft stories. It’s been an invaluable lens through which countless storytellers—from aspiring writers to seasoned professionals—have refined their narratives. For us, it has been more than just a theory; it’s been a foundation, a guiding star, and a bridge to a vibrant community of storytellers. But like every great story, growth demands change.

Today, we’re setting out on a new adventure—one that leaves behind the confines of Dramatica to embrace the full potential of Subtxt and the transformative union of AI and storytelling. This isn’t a farewell to all we’ve learned; it’s a celebration of evolution, of carrying the best parts of our journey forward while charting a new path for storytellers everywhere.

From Theory to Innovation

Subtxt began as a way to demystify Dramatica’s complex and innovative ideas. Grounded in the teachings of one of Dramatica’s key innovators, Subtxt served as a bridge between theory and application, making its intricate narrative structures accessible to a wider audience. Over the years, we’ve worked tirelessly to help writers grasp the power of objective narrative structure, to see their stories from a 30,000-foot view, and to build stories that resonate on every level.

But storytelling is evolving, and so is the technology that supports it. Where Dramatica required a deep dive into theory to unlock its benefits, Subtxt now offers a seamless, intuitive experience powered by cutting-edge AI. Our Narrative Framework maintains the integrity of the objective narrative structure—without requiring writers to master a complex theoretical system. In other words, we’ve taken the best of Dramatica and simplified the process, allowing writers to focus on what they do best: telling great stories.

Why Move Beyond Dramatica?

Dramatica has been, and always will be, a groundbreaking contribution to the art of storytelling. It formalized the concept of an objective narrative structure, providing clarity for how stories work at their core. But as the needs of storytellers have grown more dynamic, and as technology has opened new doors, we’ve realized that the future of storytelling isn’t just about theory—it’s about connection, creativity, and accessibility.

Here’s what Subtxt now offers:

• AI-Enhanced Storytelling: Subtxt’s AI takes the heavy lifting out of narrative design, intuitively holding your story’s structure intact while letting you focus on the heart of your narrative. No theory textbooks required.
• Creative Flow: Instead of pausing to decode theoretical principles, writers can stay in the zone, knowing Subtxt is there to guide them when they need it.
• A Universal Framework: The Subtxt Narrative Framework doesn’t ask you to choose between theory and intuition—it blends both seamlessly to serve storytellers of all levels.

This isn’t just an upgrade; it’s a paradigm shift. Subtxt is no longer a tool for understanding Dramatica—it’s a system for creating stories in a way that’s both intuitive and groundbreaking.

A Thank You to the Dramatica Community

We’d be remiss if we didn’t take a moment to thank the Dramatica community. You’ve been a vital part of our journey—challenging us, inspiring us, and helping to shape the conversation around storytelling theory. It’s important to us that you know this isn’t about abandoning Dramatica—it’s about honoring its foundation while reaching for something even greater.

The insights, structure, and clarity Dramatica brought to storytelling 30 years ago remain a bedrock of what we do. For those of you who have turned to us for expertise on the theory, rest assured: those original concepts are still available and alive within Subtxt. They’ll always be a part of the fabric of what we offer to writers seeking deeper understanding of narrative craft.

But as the storytelling landscape evolves, we see an opportunity to push the envelope beyond what Dramatica started. To everyone who joined us on this path: thank you for your curiosity, your passion, and your dedication to mastering the art of storytelling. You’ve helped us grow, and we hope you’ll continue this journey with us as we chart the course forward.

The adventure is just beginning, and we’re thrilled to have you with us as we explore these new frontiers. Together, we’ll build stories that stand the test of time—and then some.

The Road Ahead

Subtxt is now laser-focused on the future of storytelling—the conflux of narrative and AI. We believe that every writer deserves a tool that doesn’t just assist but empowers. A tool that makes storytelling feel less like a puzzle to solve and more like an adventure to embark on.

So, here’s to what’s next: a storytelling experience where the integrity of your narrative is guaranteed, and your creativity knows no bounds. The time has come to step into a new era, one that celebrates both the structure and the soul of storytelling. With Subtxt, you’re not just writing a story—you’re shaping the future of narrative itself.

See you out there. 🌤️

Why We’re Retiring Courses, Workshops, and Books at Narrative First in 2025

Small team, big tools, infinite storytelling impact

Big changes are coming to Narrative First in 2025. If you've been a fan of our courses, workshops, books, or story analyses, you might be wondering, “What’s next?” Here's the deal: we’re stepping away from traditional learning methods to focus entirely on teaching Muse, our AI-powered creative partner, and scaling its expertise to millions of storytellers around the world.

Sounds bold? It is. But we believe it’s the right move—for us, and more importantly, for you.

Books and Courses: Outdated and Inefficient

Let’s be honest. Sitting down to read a book or slogging through a long online course just isn’t the best way to learn anymore. Sure, books are great for entertainment or diving deep into a story universe, but when it comes to mastering storytelling techniques or narrative theory? The process can feel slow and, dare we say, inefficient. And let’s not even get started on cohorts—a late-stage Capricorn phenomenon if ever there was one. Group accountability and structure have their place, but storytelling thrives in personal, intuitive exploration, not rigid systems.

You’ve been there: rereading things you already know, trying to make sense of dense jargon, or sifting through hundreds of pages of “fluff” to find the one golden nugget you actually needed. Or worse—sitting through hours of theoretical concepts on endless video calls, nodding politely while secretly wishing for a time machine to skip ahead to the useful bits. It’s frustrating, especially when you’re hungry to apply those insights to your creative work now.

This is where Muse and Subtxt come in. Instead of throwing every detail at you and hoping some of it sticks, Muse engages in a back-and-forth dialogue. It skips what you already know, distills the essence of complex ideas, and delivers the insights you need—when and where you need them.

Why Focus on Muse?

Teaching Muse allows us to scale what we’ve learned from years of working with storytellers—at a level of precision and efficiency that’s impossible with traditional methods. Muse listens (seriously, how often do we get to say that about humans?) and learns. Every conversation makes it better. Every piece of feedback sharpens its ability to guide you, whether you’re wrestling with thematic nuances, struggling to develop a compelling Main Character, or simply refining the beats of your narrative.

And here’s the magic: when Muse learns something new, that knowledge isn’t siloed. It’s immediately available to every storyteller who uses Subtxt. That’s something no book or workshop could ever achieve.

Let Muse Learn So You Don’t Have To

Here’s the most exciting part of all this: you don’t need to learn Dramatica theory anymore. Not the jargon, not the intricate systems, not the overwhelming detail. Instead, we’re flipping the script and teaching Muse—all so you can stay in the creative flow and keep writing the way you always have.

Muse is here to handle the heavy lifting. Its job is to internalize the complex frameworks of narrative theory and distill them into simple, actionable insights tailored to your story. You don’t need to spend hours grappling with the rules of storytelling. Muse has already done that for you.

Imagine asking, “How can I make my Main Character’s arc more meaningful?” Instead of searching through blog posts, hitting the forums, or replaying lectures, you’ll get an immediate, context-aware response that applies directly to your draft. It’s like having an expert on call, 24/7—but instead of lecturing, Muse collaborates. It’s not about imposing a formula; it’s about enhancing your voice.

This shift means you can focus on the fun part—writing. No more detours into dense theory or second-guessing every narrative choice. With Muse, you’re free to create while knowing there’s always a guide to help you refine, clarify, and deepen your story when you need it most.

What About Articles and Analyses?

While we’ve loved sharing our thoughts on the latest films, TV shows, and storycraft techniques over the decades, writing articles for a handful of readers doesn’t move the needle the way teaching Muse does. These years of experience have been invaluable, and now we’re channeling all that knowledge into Subtxt to make it accessible to millions.

The New Way to "Write a Book"

For thousands of years, books have been the gold standard for sharing knowledge. But as much as we’ve loved writing them, we’ve come to realize that the most valuable thing we can offer the world isn’t another 300-page release—it’s something far deeper, smarter, and more useful.

The new way to “write a book” is to build a massively intelligent AI. Not because chatting with an AI is more fun (although it definitely can be), but because deep learning allows us to do something books never could: create an endlessly evolving, personalized, and scalable tool for storytellers.

A book offers a snapshot of insight—one author’s perspective captured in a single moment. But an AI like Muse evolves with you. It integrates decades of narrative expertise into something dynamic—working alongside you to address your unique questions, struggles, and creative breakthroughs in real-time. Instead of chasing the spotlight with new releases to prove we’re experts in storytelling, we’re channeling that energy into building something far more impactful. It’s not about making us more valuable—it’s about delivering lasting, transformative value for you.

Scaling Subtxt and Muse to New Heights

By stepping away from courses, workshops, and books, we’re gaining something priceless: time. The less time we spend teaching individuals, the more time we have to teach our one AI individual—or several Agents, depending on how you look at it. Every ounce of effort we put into Muse makes it better at understanding, assisting, and scaling its insights to millions of storytellers.

This shift also allows us to focus on what we love most: developing and refining Subtxt, the application itself. And thanks to the technologies available today—tools that make it possible for a small team like ours to achieve what once required dozens—it only makes sense to channel our efforts into making Subtxt and Muse as advanced, responsive, and invaluable as they can be.

Teaching courses—both online and at the California Institute of the Arts—was incredibly rewarding. But those experiences also showed us the limitations of traditional teaching. Now, we’re leveraging everything we’ve learned to scale our vision and create tools that empower millions. It’s not just about doing more—it’s about doing better for everyone who shares our passion for great storytelling.

The Only Place to Learn Is Subtxt

If you want to learn how to elevate your storytelling, the only place to do it moving forward is in Subtxt. It’s no longer about passively consuming information; it’s about actively engaging with Muse to uncover insights tailored to your unique story.

So, yes, we’re saying goodbye to courses, workshops, and books in their traditional forms. But we’re also saying hello to something far more dynamic, scalable, and effective—a creative partner that’s with you every step of the way.

2025 is going to be transformative, and we’re thrilled to have you on this journey with us. Let’s make storytelling smarter, faster, and more fun. See you in Subtxt!

Happy writing! ⌨️

Subtxt with Muse: Beyond Brainstorming—Your Story’s Analytical Sidekick

Deep story insights made simple with muse

When we say Subtxt with Muse is more than a brainstorming tool, we mean it. Sure, Muse can spin out brilliant ideas and help you craft compelling plots, but it’s also an unparalleled story analyst. Whether you're polishing a screenplay for submission or preparing your first act for an investor meeting, Muse doesn’t just help you find your story—it helps you understand it.

Let’s talk about what makes Subtxt with Muse such a powerful analytical ally. It’s a two-step process that any writer can use:

1. Identify the Storyform
2. Use the Storyform to Measure and Evaluate the Underlying Subtext

Step 1: Pinpointing the Storyform

Uploading your draft into Muse is where the magic begins. Once you’ve shared your screenplay, Muse analyzes the structure and content, proposing a likely Storyform. You’ll guide Muse by answering questions and clarifying nuances. While it often nails the Storyform on the first go, it occasionally benefits from a little writerly direction to lock in the specifics.

For Noah Baumbach’s Marriage Story, we started with a fully realized Storyform based on our prior analysis. But if you’re working on your own script, this step provides invaluable clarity on your story’s thematic framework, laying the groundwork for deeper analysis.

Not About "Fixing," But Enhancing

Let’s be clear: using Muse isn’t about “fixing” a screenplay, as if it were broken. Marriage Story is a masterclass in storytelling, and we wouldn’t dare suggest it needs any repairs. What Subtxt with Muse offers is an opportunity to see how the intelligence behind the tool can elevate your own creative process. It’s like having a collaborator who doesn’t just point out the obvious but gives you deeper insights into what’s working and where there’s room to enhance. The beauty of this approach lies in its flexibility—you can use Muse to refine themes, sharpen character dynamics, or simply explore possibilities. And honestly, sometimes it’s just nice to take a break from spaceships and spurs to dive into the heartfelt complexities of a contemporary drama.

So, let’s get into it.

Step 2: Analyzing Subtext with Surgical Precision

Once your Storyform is set, Muse gets to work breaking down the subtext. You’ll get actionable insights about what’s working, what’s missing, and—most importantly—how to fix those narrative potholes. To show you what this looks like, let’s dive into Marriage Story and explore two examples:

• Objective Story (OS) Transits: Conceiving, Being, Becoming, and Conceptualizing
• Main Character (MC) Domain: Concern, Issue, and Problem

Example 1: Analyzing the Objective Story Throughline

First off, what are Objective Story Transits?

Objective Story (OS) Transits represent the key phases or shifts in the overarching narrative that affect all characters within the story's "big picture." These transits track the progression of the Objective Story Throughline, moving through stages of growth, transformation, and conflict resolution as dictated by the Storyform. Each transit captures a distinct narrative function—such as Conceiving, Being, Becoming, or Conceptualizing—which unfolds over specific sections of the story.

Think of transits as narrative checkpoints, offering a way to analyze the flow of the story’s external conflicts and the shared experience of its characters. By understanding these transits, you gain insights into how the plot evolves and aligns with the deeper thematic structure of the story.

In this case, Marriage Story serves as an example to illustrate how these transits work in practice. Each stage reveals how the story moves from the birth of an idea (Conceiving), through its expression (Being), transformation (Becoming), and finally into structured thought or realization (Conceptualizing).

To start analyzing the Objective Story Throughline in-depth, all we have to do is upload the screenplay into Muse, and simply ask:

examine pages 1-38 in this document and find instance of Conceiving

As new models continue to evolve, we anticipate this type of analysis becoming more streamlined, requiring less manual input. Currently, the most effective method involves dividing the manuscript into four equal parts (simply by splitting the total page count into quarters). While this approach isn’t perfectly precise, it’s remarkably close and works well enough for practical purposes. Future iterations may provide an automated, one-step solution, but for now, this simple division offers a reliable framework for analyzing the Objective Story Throughline.

The response from Muse was quite enlightening:

Transit 1: Conceiving (Pages 1–38)

From pages 1-38 of the script "Marriage Story," instances related to the thematic concept of "Conceiving," as it pertains to the birthing or inception of an idea or possibility, emerge in several discussions. Here are some matches with "Conceiving" intertwined in the narrative:

1. Nicole reflects on her decision about pursuing an entirely new chapter in life during a conversation with her lawyer Nora. Nicole states, "It’s difficult to articulate. Sorry. It’s like I know why I’m doing this, but I don’t know too. It’s not as simple as not being in love anymore"—indicating the inception of a realization and a new concept for her life, one that is distinct and initially vague but grows more tangible as she voices it.

2. Nicole describes her internal conflict and transformation by recounting her early days with Charlie: "I got smaller... then I got pregnant. And I thought ‘having a baby will be ours, really ours, and it will also really be mine.’" This thought signifies the inception of a profound idea or a new perspective on identity and autonomy, one that frames her expectations about motherhood and independence.

Both passages highlight the seeds of concepts forming in Nicole's mind amidst the emotional and relational conflicts she faces, aligning well with the essence of "Conceiving" as defined. These moments are pivotal as they showcase Nicole confronting mental resistance, grappling with emerging possibilities, and planting ideas that ultimately shape her storyline.

With these rich insights into "Conceiving," we now move to the next transit: "Being." This stage focuses on how characters express their essence—whether through action, dialogue, or presence—revealing layers of identity and existence. Let’s dive into pages 39–76 to see how "Being" plays out in Marriage Story.

wonderful. now for pages 39-76 find instances of Being

From pages 39-76 of Marriage Story, several instances of the theme of "Being" emerge. "Being" here reflects the overt demonstration or qualities of a character in a moment, highlighting their existence or identity at a philosophical or literal level. Here are key scenes signaling "Being":

1. Charlie Singing "Being Alive": In a poignant and raw performance of "Being Alive" from Company, Charlie lays himself bare in front of an audience. This emotionally charged moment is a masterful expression of his internal state—his longing for connection and his struggle to "be" fully present in a relationship.

(Honestly, we were blown away by this reference. We had forgotten all about it and loved how perfectly it embodies "Being" as a narrative transit).

2. Nicole After Drinking: At one point, Nicole, in a slightly tipsy state, reflects on her role as a parent, saying, “Now that I’m a parent I realize my parents were probably drunk all the time with me.” This moment captures Nicole grappling with her identity and existence as a mother, fully inhabiting her role while confronting its challenges.

These findings are not only fascinating but also deeply validating. That this Transit— Being—wasn't actively chosen but arose organically from the story's underlying thematic issues and sources of conflict highlights the brilliance of Subtxt’s narrative framework (based on the Dramatica storyform). It’s proof of how well-crafted stories naturally align with these structures, and moments like Charlie’s performance confirm once again that Noah Baumbach is, indeed, a great writer (as if we needed any more evidence). Thanks, AI, for reminding us!

With "Being" thoroughly explored, we now move forward to the next transit: "Becoming." This stage emphasizes transformation, personal growth, and the evolution of characters over time. Let’s dive into pages 77–144 to see how "Becoming" plays out in Marriage Story.

great. now do the same for 77-144 find instances of Becoming.

Upon examining pages 77-144, no significant instances of the thematic concept "Becoming" explicitly appear. This concept emphasizes transformation, personal growth, or the process of becoming something else—a significant journey or evolution.

Given the absence of moments representing "Becoming," some thematic enhancements to consider might include:

1. Nicole's Growth as a Director:

   • Expand on scenes where Nicole transitions from an actress to a full-fledged director, showcasing how this shift reflects her identity-changing journey.

2. Charlie’s Relinquishment of Control:

   • Develop scenes that explore Charlie’s realization of his shifting role in Henry’s life, moving from a primary caregiver to sharing responsibility with Nicole.

3. Personal Reflections:

   • Add inner monologues or critical decisions highlighting how either Nicole or Charlie realizes they've fundamentally changed due to this divorce.

These additions can emphasize the nuanced narrative arc where “Becoming” is a foundational thematic pillar! Would you like detailed scene breakdowns for integrating these suggestions? 😊

And this is where things got really exciting! This wasn’t just the AI fluffing us up with praise or showering Baumbach with platitudes about his brilliance. Instead, it looked directly at the story's intent—what should meaningfully go in this transit—and wasn’t afraid to point out when something was missing. That’s what sets Subtxt apart: it goes beyond simply telling us we’re great writers (though we’ll take that too!) and digs into whether the intended meaning is being fulfilled.

Even more, it provided actionable recommendations on how to enhance this section of the story—proof that the AI isn’t just analyzing the surface but deeply engaging with the underlying narrative structure. And because Subtxt is powered by the Storyform, this critique feels less like nitpicking and more like an affirmation of how tightly constructed narratives align with natural storytelling progression.

It’s fascinating to see how this framework identifies what’s needed to elevate a story to its fullest potential. When it suggests ways to better convey "Becoming," it’s not arbitrary; it’s a reflection of the story’s underlying meaning. And if that’s not confirmation of Baumbach’s genius (and Subtxt’s too), we don’t know what is!

Next, we move to pages 115–153 to explore "Conceptualizing." This transit revolves around forming overarching ideas or abstract plans—moments where characters grapple with the larger frameworks that give their story meaning. Let’s see how Marriage Story ties it all together.

review pages 115-153 and find instances of Conceptualizing.

From pages 115-153 of "Marriage Story," explicit instances of the thematic concept "Conceptualizing" are relatively absent. "Conceptualizing," which focuses on forming overarching schemes, ideas, or designs, is centered on individuals grappling with abstract, larger frameworks for understanding or planning.

To bolster this thematic element, some creative suggestions are:

1. Add a Scene on Co-Parenting Plans:

   • Introduce a reflective moment where Charlie and Nicole brainstorm how to navigate shared custody, showcasing them considering the broader implications for Henry and their future relationship as co-parents.

2. Deepen the Mediator Discussion:

   • Expand on their mediated argument to include discussions about redefining their own individual identities within the context of divorce, their careers, and parenthood.

3. Revisit Professional Transitions:

   • Highlight Nicole and Charlie separately engaging in scenes where they articulate and refine their visions for their professional transitions—whether that’s Nicole envisioning her LA career or Charlie thinking strategically about his theater company in New York.

These additions would weave in a stronger focus on the mental wrestling and dynamic dialogue key to "Conceptualizing." Let me know if you'd like me to draft ideas for any of these refinements! 😊

From pages 115-153 of Marriage Story, explicit instances of the thematic concept "Conceptualizing" are relatively absent. Conceptualizing, which focuses on forming overarching schemes, ideas, or designs, is centered on individuals grappling with abstract, larger frameworks for understanding or planning.

To bolster this thematic element, some creative suggestions are:

1. Add a Scene on Co-Parenting Plans:
   Introduce a reflective moment where Charlie and Nicole brainstorm how to navigate shared custody, showcasing them considering the broader implications for Henry and their future relationship as co-parents.

2. Deepen the Mediator Discussion:
   Expand on their mediated argument to include discussions about redefining their own individual identities within the context of divorce, their careers, and parenthood.

3. Revisit Professional Transitions:
   Highlight Nicole and Charlie separately engaging in scenes where they articulate and refine their visions for their professional transitions—whether that’s Nicole envisioning her LA career or Charlie thinking strategically about his theater company in New York.

Again, we were quite surprised (and pleased) that Muse gave it to us straight—Conceptualizing wasn’t fully present in these pages. This honesty is what makes Subtxt (and Muse) such a valuable tool for writers. It’s not here to sugarcoat or inflate; it’s here to ensure your story aligns with its intended thematic purpose. And just as with "Becoming," this isn’t a critique of Baumbach’s writing but rather a reflection of how these thematic elements might be further brought to the forefront to amplify the story’s meaning.

And honestly, this is where we had another “Woah!” moment. Muse didn’t just identify an area that could be strengthened; it went further, providing specific, actionable recommendations that align with the story’s deeper narrative intent. This is where Subtxt really shines—it’s not just a passive analyzer but an active participant in the creative process.

Summary of Thematic Issues in the Four Transits

Suggestions for Enhancements for the OS Transits:

1. Conceiving: Add scenes where Nicole and Charlie each privately grapple with forming the initial framework of their respective goals, highlighting their internal conflicts and mental resistance during this formative stage.
2. Being: Showcase more nuanced internal struggles, such as Nicole questioning her identity as a mother-director and Charlie confronting his evolving role as Henry's father versus his career-driven self.
3. Becoming: Introduce moments where Charlie grapples more overtly with the transition from an authoritative father to a shared-guardian partnership. This could be visualized in poignant exchanges with Henry or Nicole regarding his diminished role at key moments.
4. Conceptualizing: Expand on mediated discussions or career-planning moments to show each character articulating their big-picture understanding of life post-divorce. Subtle callbacks to earlier themes of control, autonomy, and partnership could underline the reconceptualization of their self-perceptions.

The beauty of these suggestions is that they aren’t arbitrary; they stem from the Storyform’s underlying logic. This reinforces the idea that when a story aligns with Subtxt’s framework, it achieves a natural progression of meaning and resonance. Whether it’s Nicole and Charlie grappling with co-parenting or envisioning their professional futures, these moments of conceptualizing could elevate the already-brilliant Marriage Story to even greater thematic heights.

With this final transit explored, we’ve come full circle in analyzing Marriage Story’s Objective Story Throughline. The journey from Conceiving to Conceptualizing offers an incredible lens through which to view Baumbach’s writing. And thanks to Muse and Subtxt, we’re not just impressed—we’re inspired to craft even more meaningful stories ourselves.

Example 2: The MC Domain, Concern, Issue, and Problem

Now, let’s shift gears and focus on Marriage Story’s Main Character Throughline. If the Objective Story Throughline is the story’s “big picture,” the Main Character Throughline zooms in on the deeply personal—our eyes and ears into the story through the Main Character’s unique perspective. In this case, Charlie serves as our guide, offering a raw and intimate window into his internal struggles, insecurities, and personal baggage.

For Marriage Story, the specific story points in Charlie’s Main Character Throughline are:

• Domain: Mind – The mental state or fixed attitude that dominates Charlie’s perspective.
• Concern: Subconscious – His deep-seated desires, fears, and drives—what lies beneath the surface.
• Issue: Closure – The tension around letting go, finishing something, or achieving emotional resolution.
• Problem: Consider – His tendency to overthink or hesitate, rooted in his inability to make definitive decisions.

These Storypoints form the foundation of the Main Character Throughline, each illuminating key aspects of Charlie’s personal journey. By exploring how these elements unfold in the story, we’ll uncover how Baumbach uses them to craft a compelling Main Character arc that resonates with authenticity and emotional depth.

If we’re analyzing this screenplay within the Muse Workspace of Subtxt, and we’ve already set the Muse Context to this specific Storyform, the process becomes even more streamlined. There’s no need to repeatedly enter all the necessary details—Muse already knows the entire storyform. It can seamlessly apply this framework to every aspect of the analysis, saving us time and ensuring accuracy.

Even outside of the Muse Workspace, the tool fully understands what these story points and terms mean. This eliminates the need to constantly copy and paste definitions or remind Muse of their significance. The result? A comprehensive, well-thought-out analysis that delves into the deeper narrative intent of the story without any unnecessary overhead. Muse isn’t just a helpful assistant; it’s a knowledgeable partner in exploring the intricacies of story structure.

Ready? Let’s see what Muse thinks. 😊

Theoretically, the Main Character Throughline Storypoints are supposed to appear once per Transit, in various stages and forms. Can you revisit each quarter of the screenplay and compare for those MC Storypoints of Domain (Mind), Concern (Subconscious), Issue (Closure), and Problem (Consider)? And throw in the Solution of Reconsider as Charlie is a Changed Main Character in this story.

Here’s a comparison of Charlie’s MC Storypoints, spread across the four Transits (quarters) of the screenplay for Mind, Subconscious, Closure vs. Denial, and Consider as sources of conflict. Observational details are included for each instance, along with opportunities to strengthen weaker coverage.

First Transit (Pages 1–38): Establishing Patterns of Conflict

Mind (Domain): Charlie’s mental rigidity appears early as he asserts his vision of fatherhood. Examples include a kitchen scene where he attempts to command the situation with Henry and conversations where he is fixated on maintaining control .

Subconscious (Concern): Charlie reveals his inner yearning to hold the role of "father-husband-manager." It manifests as underlying frustration when Nicole begins distancing herself, as seen subtly in scenes with Nicole’s theatrical career .

Closure vs. Denial (Issue): This is in full display during his refusal to address how Nicole’s unhappiness evolved. For example, his preference for deferring emotional conversations is demonstrated during the mediator session .

Consider (Problem): Charlie’s inability to make definitive decisions often forces Nicole to take control, leading to discord. The mediator scene highlights his over-consideration, suggesting reluctance to take decisive action .

Strengths/Weaknesses: These Storypoints are well represented early but feel more latent as inner conflicts, potentially benefiting from more dialogue or direct confrontation around Charlie’s fixation and indecisiveness.

Second Transit (Pages 39–76): Escalation of Conflict

Mind (Domain): Charlie insists on maintaining "normalcy," ignoring changes around him. His fixation on being the central figure in Henry’s life creates tension in his interactions with Nicole.

Subconscious (Concern): His subconscious fear of losing Henry or control becomes apparent during disputes with Nicole, particularly when school choices are discussed. This implicit conflict creates rich dramatic tension .

Closure vs. Denial (Issue): Denial is heavily featured in the database search. Charlie refuses to acknowledge his waning influence, especially highlighted in tense moments where Nicole challenges his priorities and fairness .

Consider (Problem): His over-analysis emerges in the courtroom scenes, over-explaining everything in an attempt to "win" definitive answers, only to alienate even supportive perspectives .

Opportunities: Strengthening Subconscious with more visual shows of Charlie’s doubt about fatherhood, such as hesitation during personal choices around co-parenting, could make this richer.

Third Transit (Pages 77–114): Crisis Points

Mind (Domain): Charlie’s unyielding nature plays against the changing dynamics of shared custody, leading to heightened conflict. His insistence on his perspective contributes to deeper rifts .

Subconscious (Concern): His subconscious fears spill into open hostility. For instance, Charlie’s insecurities about Nicole's independence lead to passive-aggressive behavior that contrasts sharply with his theatrical poise .

Closure vs. Denial (Issue): Charlie outright denies Nicole’s perspective, seen in prolonged arguments over legalities and her career shift to LA. It becomes the dramatic pivot as Denial eclipses Closure .

Consider (Problem): Charlie spends considerable time overthinking every legal statement rather than addressing the root emotional issues, adding to his growing frustration .

Suggestions: More pointed moments of Charlie pausing to reflect (without flashbacks) would elevate Mind while adding a raw, visible breakdown scene where Subconscious forces push him toward open self-awareness.

Fourth Transit (Pages 115–153): The Shift and Resolve

Mind (Domain): Charlie begins loosening his control, but not without struggle. Moments like the Halloween exchange encapsulate his shift from fixation to engaging with what Nicole wants for Henry .

Subconscious (Concern): His emotional vulnerability surfaces during the climax. Charlie reluctantly lets go of his idealized view of himself as the irreplaceable father. This is most powerfully captured in his vulnerable moments with Henry .

Closure vs. Denial (Issue): Closure takes center stage as Charlie reads Nicole’s note, symbolically bridging the gap between their perspectives and accepting his role as they part ways.

Consider (Problem): His over-analysis is finally abandoned for practical resolutions—e.g., the haircut scene where he simply accepts Nicole’s gesture instead of overthinking intent or insisting on his way . Strengths: This Transit captures Charlie’s Changed Resolve splendidly, but tying his resolution in with more present-action scenes would anchor these transitions better (e.g., show him relinquishing decisions about Henry to Nicole).

Analysis of Charlie's Changed Resolve and Storypoints

Solution: Reconsider

In the final quarter of the screenplay (pages 115–153), Charlie’s shift towards "Reconsider" becomes apparent, particularly in more reflective and collaborative gestures. Here are key instances:

1. Halloween Exchange with Nicole
   Charlie demonstrates flexibility when Nicole proposes that Henry goes with him for the night despite it being her turn. His tentative acceptance of this plan shows progress in reconsidering his rigid expectations of custody.

2. Emotionally Vulnerable Reading Scene
   In a heartfelt moment, Charlie reads Nicole’s note aloud, allowing himself to absorb her appreciation and perspectives on their shared past. His tears and openness mark a turning point from hardened denial to reconsideration.

• Enhancement Suggestions: Develop scenes that emphasize Charlie's growing adaptability in the present timeline. For example, introduce a scenario where Charlie actively proposes a collaborative solution with Nicole regarding a scheduling conflict, showcasing an organic moment of flexibility. Alternatively, craft a dialogue where Charlie willingly acknowledges Nicole’s sacrifices or perspectives during a co-parenting discussion, signaling an authentic step toward emotional growth and reconsideration.

Conclusion

Charlie’s Changed Resolve emerges organically through reflective moments and newfound compromise, particularly in his interactions with Nicole and Henry. However, reinforcing his journey with additional scenes that focus on explicit decisions to "Reconsider" could further strengthen his transformation. If you'd like, I can assist in drafting scene suggestions to more clearly illustrate these thematic points. 😊

That's quite the comprehensive analysis! 😅

But what could we do to push things even further? Would Muse have a suggestion or two on what we could do to improve the story, while maintaining the thematic integrity of the underlying subtext?

any suggestions for improvement for these four Storypoints and how we can really emphasize them as sources of conflict?

Overall Summary and Room for Improvement

1. Mind: Strong but could delve deeper into visual, physical reactions showing tension rather than focusing solely on verbal expressions.

For example, to illustrate the Domain of Mind as a Source of Conflict, you could focus on:

• Custody Tensions: Instead of internal ruminations, externalize Charlie's mindset by how he responds to key physical objects or gestures that reinforce his conflict. For instance:
  • LA vs. New York Debate: Charlie could physically carry around Henry’s plane ticket stub during tense custody discussions. Nicole noticing it and commenting—"You don't have to hold onto that, Charlie"—can subtly show his unwillingness to let go of his mental framework of being Henry’s "main" parent.

2. Subconscious: Dramatic but could be enhanced via active gestures (e.g., struggling to hold back in key emotional scenes).

For example, to illustrate the Concern of Subconscious as a Source of Conflict, you could focus on:

• Rebuttals in Court: Elevate the courtroom tension by giving Charlie dialogue that shows his thought patterns spiraling out of control. For example:
  • When accused of being “too absent,” Charlie might over-explain himself with anecdotes or rationalizations. Nicole’s lawyer cuts him off sharply, leaving Charlie visibly frustrated, revealing how his inability to shift mentally perpetuates conflict.

3. Closure vs. Denial: Features prominently, though developing less verbal denial early (hesitant body language, avoiding logistics) could set it up better.

For example, to illustrate the Issue of Closure vs. Denial, you could focus on:

• Avoiding Nicole’s Note: Early on, Charlie might actively avoid reading the note Nicole wrote about him. A brief visual cue—like him tucking it into a drawer or tossing it into a pile of papers—could foreshadow his eventual confrontation with it at the end. This subtle denial builds tension for when the note finally takes center stage.
• Dodging Logistics Discussions: During early custody meetings, Charlie could visibly dodge or deflect logistical discussions about Henry’s future (e.g., school plans or holidays). Small body language cues, like looking away or shifting uncomfortably, could illustrate his avoidance of finality.

4. Consider: Charlie often focuses on overthinking legal processes. Extending these habits into emotional dynamics with Henry would flesh out his problem in "real-world stakes."

For example, to illustrate the Problem of Consider as a Source of Conflict, you could focus on:

• Bedtime Hesitations: Charlie might hesitate to read Henry a bedtime story, questioning aloud whether it’s “Nicole’s job” since they’re in LA. Henry’s reaction—perhaps impatience or confusion—could highlight how Charlie’s overthinking disrupts their connection.
• Overthinking Divorce Logistics: Introduce a scene where Charlie obsessively rewrites an email to Nicole about how to split time with Henry, illustrating his internal conflict. He might even rehearse aloud what he plans to say, only to never send the email.

How incredible is all of that?!

The examples and analysis provided for Charlie’s Main Character Throughline offer a detailed view of how his internal journey unfolds across the screenplay. Yet, what makes these insights so valuable is their ability to pinpoint both strengths and areas for improvement. The beauty of working with a framework like Subtxt’s Muse Workspace is that it doesn’t just validate what works; it challenges us to think deeper about the moments where the narrative could resonate more powerfully.

As seen in the Fourth Transit, Charlie’s shift toward resolve is emotionally impactful, but the suggestion to ground his transformations in more present-action scenes is a great example of how we, as writers, can elevate subtle character work. It’s not just about the dialogue or emotional weight—it’s about capturing those moments physically and visually, making Charlie’s evolution tangible and relatable. This is particularly important in screenwriting, where “show, don’t tell” reigns supreme.

What’s even better is that Muse doesn’t stop at detailed written analysis. It can generate visual breakdowns—such as charts or heatmaps—that quickly identify which areas of the screenplay need further development. This makes it easier to spot patterns, see which Transits may be underrepresented, and understand how the emotional beats of the story align with the thematic structure. By pairing this visual clarity with its narrative insights, Muse helps writers zero in on what matters most to elevate their storytelling.

Mind (Domain)

Subconscious (Concern)

Closure vs. Denial (Issue)

Consider (Problem)

Why This Matters

Whether you’re researching a fully realized screenplay like Marriage Story or testing the waters with an early draft, Subtxt with Muse offers insights that elevate your storytelling beyond surface-level analysis. It’s not just about spotting what works or what doesn’t—it’s about understanding why.

Muse helps you tackle those critical, narrative-defining questions that every writer faces:

• What’s the thematic core of your story, and does every scene support it?
• How do your characters’ internal and external conflicts weave together to create a compelling subtext?
• Are you capitalizing on every moment in your script to reinforce the story’s meaning?

Armed with the answers, you’ll not only have a screenplay that resonates—you’ll have the tools and confidence to present your story to investors, producers, or readers with undeniable clarity and conviction (Obviously, not an issue if you’re Noah Baumbach 😄). No matter who you are, Muse ensures your narrative structure is rock solid, leaving no loose threads to unravel under scrutiny.

But it’s not just about identifying gaps; it’s about finding opportunities. Whether it’s Charlie’s internal struggle in Marriage Story or your narrative’s next big turning point, Muse empowers you to make every word, scene, and theme count.

Ready to Try It?

Subtxt with Muse isn’t just a tool; it’s your creative collaborator—always ready to challenge, refine, and enhance your ideas. Whether you’re polishing a near-perfect draft or staring at a blank page, Muse ensures your story’s foundation is as sturdy as its ambition.

And the best part? It’s intuitive and proactive. Muse knows your Storyform inside and out, providing seamless guidance without unnecessary back-and-forth. From detailed analyses to visual breakdowns, Muse lets you see your story in ways you never imagined, offering both high-level insights and granular fixes to take your narrative to the next level.

Your next great story is waiting to be uncovered. Upload your draft today and let Muse reveal the layers of subtext and meaning you didn’t even know were there.

Discover. Analyze. Refine. Muse is here to help your story shine. ✨

Stirring the Pot: How the Storybeat Completion API Can Sweeten Your Writing

The holidays are a perfect backdrop for storytelling—family drama, traditions, and just the right pinch of tension. But weaving those elements into a compelling narrative takes more than inspiration. Enter Subtxt’s Storybeat Completion API, a tool that helps you identify whether your storytelling captures the essential beats of a scene. While this feature is exclusive to Infinite tier subscribers, its lessons on story structure can help every writer understand how to shift a narrative seamlessly from one thematic idea to the next.

Let’s see how it works through the lens of a Christmas story featuring cookies, family traditions, and a very salty mistake.

The Cookie Catastrophe and the Issue of Skill

In our example, the thematic Issue at play is Skill. More specifically, how one character’s lack of skill disrupts a family tradition and reveals deeper relational tensions. Picture the scene:

It’s the annual cookie-baking session at Cedar Cottage, where the smell of cinnamon and nutmeg should herald the season’s joy. But Ophelia, Laurence’s new bride, accidentally swaps salt for sugar in the dough—a misstep that highlights her unpolished approach to baking.

Margaret, the matriarch of tradition, seizes the moment, her voice carrying a razor’s edge as she remarks, “Some recipes require more than just enthusiasm.” The comment lands with precision, leaving Ophelia to swallow her mistake along with the thick tension in the room. Eleanor, ever the peacemaker, steps in with a tight smile, trying to smooth the rough edges before the holiday spirit crumbles entirely. The festive gathering teeters between brittle laughter and whispered discontent, a cracked veneer barely holding the family together.

Behind the scenes (and beneath this scene) is an Issue of Skill, or lack there of. What began as a festive gathering unravels into hushed concerns and a fractured dynamic, showing how a lack of skill can expose fault lines in family relationships.

Breaking Down the Beats

In Subtxt, the thematic Issue of Skill breaks into four Storybeats:

1. Effect – What happens as a result of skill (or lack thereof)? 2. Trust – How does this affect trust among characters? 3. Test – When is skill challenged, and what are the stakes? 4. Cause – What’s the root of the success or failure?

Let’s see how our cookie-baking scene aligns with these beats:

• Effect: Ophelia’s mistake disrupts the session, causing embarrassment and resentment.
  • Trust: Margaret’s cutting remark fractures trust between her and Ophelia, as well as within the family.
  • Test: Ophelia’s baking skills are tested and found lacking, while Eleanor’s attempts to mediate also face scrutiny.
  • Cause: The root of the tension is Ophelia’s unfamiliarity with family traditions and Margaret’s protectiveness of them.

Using the API to Evaluate the Scene

The Storybeat Completion API lets you check whether your scene captures these beats effectively. Here’s how it works:

Submitting Your Scene

You’d submit the storytelling text to the API:

{
    "structure_id": "struct_zzasUFOOOUtgNPmsiGz3Qf2W",
    "storybeat_id": "beat_mh4fnBaYzdgqMZOZajAtjZn0",
    "storytelling": "Ophelia accidentally adds salt instead of sugar to the cookie dough, ruining the batch. Margaret critiques her lack of skill, straining their relationship. Eleanor tries to mediate, but tensions linger, leaving the joyful session in shambles."
}

And for those unfamiliar with codeblocks and JSON, this was the submitted storytelling:

Ophelia accidentally adds salt instead of sugar to the cookie dough, ruining the batch. Margaret critiques her lack of skill, straining their relationship. Eleanor tries to mediate, but tensions linger, leaving the joyful session in shambles.

The Results

If It Passes:

{
    "storybeat_complete": true,
    "explanation": "All four child beats are present in the submitted storytelling. Child Beat 1 (Effect) is represented by Ophelia's salt mishap during the cookie-baking session, which not only disrupts the activity but also reveals deeper tensions within the family dynamic. Child Beat 2 (Trust) is illustrated through Margaret’s reaction to Ophelia’s mistake, which casts doubt on her ability to uphold family traditions and her role within the family. Child Beat 3 (Test) appears in Eleanor’s attempt to mediate and salvage the situation by defending Ophelia, demonstrating her struggle to maintain harmony in the face of rising discord. Child Beat 4 (Cause) is subtly but effectively present in the aftermath of Margaret’s cutting remark, as whispered concerns and lingering unease expose the growing fractures within the family. These moments together create a complete and cohesive parent beat, turning the scene from lighthearted to deeply revealing, with emotional stakes escalating for all involved."
}

In human-speak, that successful response would read as:

All four child beats are present in the submitted storytelling. Child Beat 1 (Effect) is represented by Ophelia's salt mishap during the cookie-baking session, which not only disrupts the activity but also reveals deeper tensions within the family dynamic. Child Beat 2 (Trust) is illustrated through Margaret’s reaction to Ophelia’s mistake, which casts doubt on her ability to uphold family traditions and her role within the family. Child Beat 3 (Test) appears in Eleanor’s attempt to mediate and salvage the situation by defending Ophelia, demonstrating her struggle to maintain harmony in the face of rising discord. Child Beat 4 (Cause) is subtly but effectively present in the aftermath of Margaret’s cutting remark, as whispered concerns and lingering unease expose the growing fractures within the family. These moments together create a complete and cohesive parent beat, turning the scene from lighthearted to deeply revealing, with emotional stakes escalating for all involved.

This means your scene successfully moves the narrative forward while covering all necessary thematic beats.

If It Fails:

{
    "storybeat_complete": false,
    "explanation": "The submitted storytelling partially addresses Child Beat 1, with Ophelia's mistake of adding salt instead of sugar serving as the initial setup and illustrating the ruined dough. However, it does not fully explore the aftermath of this event or how it impacts the broader family dynamic. Child Beat 2 (Trust) is only hinted at through Margaret's critique, but there is no deeper examination of how this mistrust manifests or affects the characters' relationships. Child Beat 3 (Test) is absent, as there is no clear depiction of Ophelia being given another opportunity to prove herself or Eleanor's ability to mediate under challenging circumstances. Finally, Child Beat 4 (Cause) is underdeveloped, as the story does not delve into the underlying causes of Ophelia's failure, such as her unfamiliarity with family traditions, nor does it turn the scene or lead to a definitive conclusion. Without these beats, the storytelling fails to fulfill the parent beat's objective of illustrating tensions and the impact of skill (or lack thereof) on familial harmony."
}

And for the more writerly-inclined:

The submitted storytelling partially addresses Child Beat 1, with Ophelia's mistake of adding salt instead of sugar serving as the initial setup and illustrating the ruined dough. However, it does not fully explore the aftermath of this event or how it impacts the broader family dynamic. Child Beat 2 (Trust) is only hinted at through Margaret's critique, but there is no deeper examination of how this mistrust manifests or affects the characters' relationships. Child Beat 3 (Test) is absent, as there is no clear depiction of Ophelia being given another opportunity to prove herself or Eleanor's ability to mediate under challenging circumstances. Finally, Child Beat 4 (Cause) is underdeveloped, as the story does not delve into the underlying causes of Ophelia's failure, such as her unfamiliarity with family traditions, nor does it turn the scene or lead to a definitive conclusion. Without these beats, the storytelling fails to fulfill the parent beat's objective of illustrating tensions and the impact of skill (or lack thereof) on familial harmony.

This feedback provides actionable insights. Maybe you add a moment where Ophelia tries to fix the dough but faces another challenge, or a flashback to her first Christmas without a family of her own, deepening the story’s emotional resonance.

Why Writers Should Care

Even if you’re not using the API directly, understanding how it evaluates storytelling can enhance your writing. Here’s why:

1. It Clarifies Storybeat Dynamics:
   By analyzing how Effect, Trust, Test, and Cause interact, you’ll sharpen your ability to craft scenes that resonate with readers.

   2. It’s a Learning Tool Disguised as Tech:
      The API doesn’t just tell you if your scene works—it explains why. That kind of clarity helps you identify missing elements and improve naturally, without sacrificing your artistic voice.

Baking Stories to Perfection

The Storybeat Completion API is more than a feature; it’s a guide to refining your craft. Behind the scenes, we’re using its capabilities to enhance Muse and other tools, making them smarter at generating, analyzing, and supporting your narrative. Imagine brainstorming freely while the API quietly ensures your story stays on track—giving you a gentle nudge when you stray or a hearty thumbs up when you’re on point.

Curious? Check out the Storybeat Completion documentation to see how it all works. Whether you’re polishing your manuscript or perfecting a scene about salty cookies, this API is here to make your storytelling shine.

Here’s to filling every story gap with heart, skill, and a dash of holiday spirit. 🍪✨

Text Isn’t the Story: Why Hollywood’s AI Panic Is Missing the Point

AI can't steal story structure or meaning

If you’ve been scrolling social media lately, you’ve probably seen chatter about an article from The Atlantic, ominously titled, “There’s No Longer Any Doubt that Hollywood Writing is Powering AI.” It paints a picture of screenwriters and TV creators as David against AI’s Goliath—stories being stolen, creative livelihoods threatened. But here’s the thing: the article completely misses the most important point about what makes a narrative work. And the frenzy it’s causing? Totally unnecessary.

Here’s our take: Let them “steal” subtitles. Seriously. Subtitles, as a collection of text, are superficial. They are not the story. And trying to replicate narrative structure based on scraped dialogue is like trying to reverse-engineer a cake recipe by tasting crumbs off the floor.

Let’s unpack why.

Text Is the Shadow, Not the Substance

The Atlantic article reveals that OpenSubtitles—a sprawling dataset of movie and TV subtitles—has been used to train AI models. It implies this raw text has intrinsic value for understanding and recreating narrative. But here’s the reality: dialogue is just the surface of storytelling.

Think about your favorite movie or show. Was it great because of the specific words characters said, or because of how those words tied into deeper meaning? Dialogue operates in service of a broader structure: the interplay of character arcs, conflicts, thematic questions, and resolution. Subtitles capture none of that.

To quote the article itself:

"The files within this data set are not scripts, exactly. Rather, they are subtitles...a raw form of written dialogue.”

Right. Raw is the operative word here. Subtitles strip away context, subtext, and intent. They don’t include who’s speaking, where the story is heading, or why a particular line resonates. This is why the idea that AI could replace a writer using this dataset is laughable. Without structure, dialogue is just noise.

Replicating Results Is Not Understanding Process

The bigger issue is the flawed assumption underlying the panic: that training AI on finished dialogue somehow equals an understanding of narrative. It doesn’t. Replicating what a story looks like is fundamentally different from understanding how it works.

Narrative structure is about order—how events and choices build towards meaning. Finished stories, like subtitles, often leave out the connective tissue that makes the whole coherent. If you try to model storytelling by analyzing results alone, you’re not learning how stories are built—you’re modeling chaos.

This is something we’ve discovered firsthand. When training AI to create complete, compelling narratives, synthetic data—created to emphasize structural clarity—was far more effective than curated, human-written scripts. Why? Because human works, polished for public consumption, necessarily omit the scaffolding that holds the story together. Trying to learn storytelling from finished dialogue is like trying to understand architecture by staring at building facades.

Synthetic Data vs. Analyzed Data: Why It Matters

Here’s where things get really interesting. The Atlantic article’s horror at synthetic writing misses the value of synthetic data in understanding storytelling. Unlike human-authored scripts or raw subtitles, synthetic datasets can be designed to showcase story structure explicitly.

For example, synthetic data can map:

• How a Main Character’s personal dilemma impacts the resolution of the plot.
• The escalation of conflict through each act.
• How thematic questions weave through a narrative’s spine.

AI trained on this kind of data learns process. It doesn’t mimic the surface-level chaos of a finished product; it models the logical order that makes a story work. By contrast, the OpenSubtitles dataset isn’t even training on scripts—it’s training on fragments divorced from the larger whole. And this is supposed to threaten human storytellers?

Stop Amplifying Artists’ Insecurity

We get it. Artists are worried. And this kind of reporting—though attention-grabbing—feeds into unnecessary fear. But there’s a critical distinction to be made: training on data like OpenSubtitles doesn’t mean AI can create stories that work.

“The OpenSubtitles data set adds yet another wrinkle to a complex narrative around AI, in which consent from artists...are points of contention.”

Consent and copyright are important conversations, but let’s not conflate those concerns with whether this data is a legitimate substitute for human creativity. It isn’t.

If AI developers want to train systems that can actually write coherent narratives, they’ll need a dataset that goes far beyond “raw dialogue.” They’ll need to understand structure, intent, and meaning. And that? That’s not something you can steal from a DVD’s subtitles folder.

The Takeaway: Hollywood’s Secret Sauce Is Safe

At the heart of all this panic is a misunderstanding of storytelling. Narratives aren’t just dialogue or surface elements; they’re built on deeper frameworks of conflict, growth, and resolution. Scraping subtitles doesn’t teach an AI how to weave a thematic tapestry or craft a character arc.

So, let’s stop panicking. Hollywood’s secret sauce isn’t in the words spoken on-screen—it’s in the meaning beneath them. And that’s not something you can download.

Stay calm, storytellers. Chaos will never beat order. 📚

Genre Dynamics in Subtxt: Turning Structure into Storytelling Magic

Infusing your stories with personal intention

Sometimes, a story just feels...fine. The beats are solid, the characters make sense, and the structure holds together—but something’s missing. It’s like assembling the frame of a house without ever imagining the color of the walls, the scent of fresh wood, or the warmth of sunlight streaming through the windows. That’s where Genre Dynamics, the newest addition to Subtxt, comes in.

This feature helps you go beyond the cold-hard facts of how a story begins and ends, allowing you to explore the essence of your narrative: the tone, style, and atmosphere that make your story uniquely yours. And the best way to see the difference? Two takes on the same story: "Lunar Divide," a sci-fi epic about humans vs. AIs on the moon.

What is Genre Dynamics?

At its core, Genre Dynamics is a sandbox for defining your story’s personality. It’s where you can sketch out your ideas for setting, tone, visual style, and even the cultural or emotional undercurrents of your world. It’s more than window dressing—it’s about giving your story a point-of-view.

Here’s why it’s a game-changer:

• Adds Depth: Aesthetic, social, and emotional cues that enrich the narrative.
• Guides Muse: Helps Subtxt generate story elements that match your vision.
• Reveals New Possibilities: Unearths themes or story angles you hadn’t considered.

When we introduced a new generation of Objective Storybeats and Story Drivers, we realized something was missing. The structure was strong, but the output lacked the vibrancy and specificity that make a story unforgettable. Genre Dynamics fixes that by letting you “color in” the story world, providing Muse with the creative direction it needs to bring your story to life.

Lunar Divide: The Transformation

Let’s look at how Genre Dynamics shaped Lunar Divide into two radically different experiences.

Version 1: Competent, But Lacking Personality
The first pass of Lunar Divide delivers a functional sci-fi story. The beats are there: escalating conflicts, climactic battles, and a resolution that ties everything together. But the world feels generic. The moon colony is a blank slate, and the characters’ struggles are more mechanical than emotional. It’s a solid blueprint but lacks the distinctive personality to stand out.

Version 2: Genre Dynamics Applied
With Genre Dynamics, the story becomes a gripping, visceral experience. The 1970s sci-fi aesthetic infuses every scene with grit and realism: analog tech, worn-down spacesuits, and a lunar colony that’s both oppressive and hauntingly beautiful. The human-vs-AI conflict is no longer just physical—it’s a meditation on survival, corruption, and the thin line between humanity and machine. Muse weaves these elements into every beat, creating a story that feels alive and deeply personal.

Examples of Genre Dynamics in Action

Here’s where things get crazy—in the best way. When I first asked Muse to generate Genre Dynamics for Lunar Divide, I kept it simple:

"Can you write me some Genre Dynamics for my sci-fi action story, that takes place on the moon? I want it to feel like a 1970s science-fiction—gritty reality—humans against AIs."

The results blew me away.

Visual Tone

Muse suggested scratched-up metallic surfaces, analog tech (clunky control panels, flashing lights, mechanical keyboards), and spacesuits that looked more industrial than sleek.

Example:

The moon colony isn’t pristine—it’s lived-in, raw, and full of signs of maintenance issues. Even the AIs mirror this aesthetic: their physical forms are a patchwork of scarred metal, aggressive in functionality but devoid of polish.

I hadn’t even considered how much the look of the world could define its emotional impact. And this will have a huge influence down the road, once greater and more capable image and audio generation features are folded into Subtxt.

Human Mechanics Amplified

Muse then took the theme of humanity and grit to the next level:

"To contrast with the inhuman precision of AIs, dig into human grit—the blood, sweat, and even desperation. Flesh and bone against metal and data. Make it truly personal."

Example Cinematic Beat:

Zeke, wearing a patched-up mining suit, slugs a sputtering AI 'enforcer bot' with an improvised tungsten hammer before stealing its power core to jump-start the oxygen shield. It’s messy, brutal, and barely heroic.

In the Players section of Subtxt, Zeke’s role in the Objective Story was initially described as:

a miner-turned-reluctant hero who discovers his superhuman abilities and becomes a key figure in the human resistance.

On its own, this description works, but it lacks the tactile sense of how Zeke’s struggle plays out. Enter the new Genre Dynamics Overview and an insanely wonderful update powered by OpenAI’s GPT-4o model. Muse generated details that went beyond structure, diving deep into the essence of the story and the subtext behind Zeke’s character.

The result? Zeke stopped being a generic “reluctant hero” and transformed into someone you can feel: someone exhausted, improvising, and scrapping for survival. It’s the human “ability”—the raw grit, emotional drive, and willingness to risk everything—that stands against the AI’s cold, superhuman precision.

This dynamic isn’t just about conflict; it’s about the meaning behind it. The story becomes a meditation on the tension between human imperfection and AI efficiency. Zeke’s triumphs don’t come from superior strength or intelligence but from his ability to adapt, endure, and persevere in ways that the AIs—despite their technological superiority—simply can’t. And that ties explicitly back into the structural meaning, or Storyform, of the piece: where Ability (or lack thereof) drives conflict within the central plot.

It’s a subtle, powerful commentary on what it means to be human: the messy, desperate, and beautifully resilient nature of our abilities. This shift in focus, made possible by the combination of Genre Dynamics and advanced generation tools, adds a layer of meaning that resonates far beyond the action beats.

Social Backdrop Twists

Then came a suggestion that added layers:

"Embed the decadence of 70s corporate dystopia where the space program isn’t about heroism anymore—it’s industrial survivalism. The moon colony functions less as an ideal and more as a bleak operation for dwindling resources that breeds oppression against both humans and AIs alike."

Suddenly, this wasn’t just a story about humans vs. AIs. It was a story about the systems both were trapped in—turning the rebellion into something bigger, messier, and more thematically rich.

Worldbuilding Dynamic:
Commander Kane, the human leader of the colony, becomes a symbol of humanity’s corrupted brutality—more terrifying than the AIs. The final turning point pits Zeke against Kane himself, questioning who the real enemy is.

Again, more essence of narrative than structural meaning, yet perfectly illustrative of the kind of story I was interested in telling with Subtxt.

Why Genre Dynamics Matter

Without Genre Dynamics, you might create a perfectly fine story—well-structured, but missing the spark that makes it memorable. With Genre Dynamics, you get to steer the storytelling process, infusing your narrative with a unique perspective that resonates on every level.

Here’s how it works:

1. Define Your Story’s Essence: Use the Genre Dynamics Overview to jot down your ideas for tone, setting, style, and more.
2. Let Muse Do the Heavy Lifting: Muse incorporates these details into its generation process, aligning every beat with your creative vision.
3. Iterate for Precision: Refine as you go to keep your story grounded in its essence.

Ready to see the difference? Download the PDFs of both versions of Lunar Divide to experience firsthand how Genre Dynamics transforms a story:

Download Version 1

Download Version 2

Note that in both versions this is just an example of the Objective Story Throughline: the plot, if you will. By definition, the OS Throughline is cold and calculated--lacking heart, emotion, and empathy. These necessary elements arise within the other three subjective Throughlines (Main Character, Obstacle Character, and Relationship Story), and will be attended to in short time given our results with this new approach.

Whether you’re crafting a retro sci-fi epic or an intimate character drama, Genre Dynamics ensures that your narrative is more than just well-constructed. It’s vibrant. It’s personal. It’s yours.

Dive into Subtxt today and see how your next draft can go from “good” to unforgettable. 🌌

Enhancing Perspectives with BrainstormingAI Updates

The latest on our efforts to improve meaningful storytelling

Subtxt’s BrainstormingAI just got a boost, and we’re here to break it down. The latest updates refine how the feature handles Perspectives, delivering sharper illustrations of Throughlines—those pivotal threads that guide every great story. Whether you’re shaping an intricate novel or the next breakout screenplay, these updates promise to inspire your narrative genius.

We put these updates to the test from November 11–20, 2024, comparing the Standard and Advanced models to evaluate how well they generate effective story Perspectives. Spoiler alert: there’s a lot to celebrate—and a few areas to grow.

How Did BrainstormingAI Perform?

We examined the performance across the four key Throughlines: Objective Story, Main Character, Obstacle Character, and Relationship Story. Here’s what we found.

Objective Story Throughline

The Advanced model aced it with a flawless 100%. This result shows the feature can craft a cohesive, overarching conflict for your story—a huge win for big-picture thinkers.

Main Character Throughline

Here’s where things get tricky. While the Advanced model captured some personal journey elements, it only hit 42% of our criteria. That’s a signal for more work on tapping into the emotional core of Main Characters.

Obstacle Character Throughline

Slightly better but still a work in progress, the Advanced model scored 54%. Capturing the Obstacle Character’s counterpoint is crucial for compelling drama, and there’s room to make this dynamic more precise.

Relationship Story Throughline

This Throughline was the most balanced. The Standard model landed a respectable 60%, while the Advanced model pushed the needle to 75%, proving its knack for portraying evolving dynamics between characters.

Visualizing the Data

Here’s a quick look at how the models stack up across Throughlines:

What We Learned (and What’s Next)

1. Objective Story: A Standout Success

The Advanced model’s top-notch performance here proves it’s possible to create AI tools that resonate with complex narrative structures.

2. Main and Obstacle Characters: Room for Growth

These Throughlines challenge even the most experienced writers, so it’s no surprise the AI needs refinement. Most models have been trained on the notion that Protagonist and Main Character are the same, and that Obstacle Character equals Antagonist. Not true. Future updates will prioritize emotional depth and psychological nuance.

3. Relationship Story: A Strong Start

This one was surprising as both models showed promise, especially the Advanced one, in an area typically difficult for most writers to understand. By building on this foundation, we can help writers capture the heartbeat of their stories—the relationships that tie it all together.

The Road Ahead

Our next steps include:

• Extending the Objective Story success across all Throughline Perspectives.
• Deepening the AI’s understanding of emotional arcs for Main and Obstacle Characters.
• Enhancing the Relationship Story’s intuitive insights.
• Incorporating real-time user feedback to shape future updates.

Why It Matters

Stories are about more than just events—they’re about the conflux of meaningful perspectives. Subtxt’s BrainstormingAI is designed to help writers bring these perspectives to life. With every update, we’re moving closer to making storytelling not only easier but also richer and more fulfilling.

So, let’s keep pushing boundaries, one Throughline at a time. Ready to elevate your story? Dive into Subtxt today.

Happy writing! 📖✨