The most important part of any story exists at the intersection of the objective and subjective points-of-view within the narrative.
Audiences gravitate towards great stories because they can experience something unattainable in their own lives. They can feel the story's problem personally, while at the same time reason the problem from a distance. With this in mind, the most important part of any great story lies at the nexus point between this subjective and objective points-of-view.
We can't simultaneously be within and without ourselves; stories can. Through the Main Character Throughline we get to experience this inequity personally and from within; through the Objective Story Throughline we get to observe this inequity objectively and from without. By presenting a view from both sides, a great narrative grants us the opportunity to better appreciate the problems we face in our lives.
In Dramatica, the point at which the Objective Story Throughline intersects with the Main Character Throughline is called the Crucial Element. The exact location of this element of story structure shifts based on other narrative dynamics, namely the Main Character Resolve, the Main Character Growth, and the Story Outcome. Understanding how these story points integrate to define the Crucial Element helps a writer elevate the impact of their stories.
In this series on Writing for Nanowrimo, we focused on the creative potential found in Dramatica's brainstorming tools. With this final article, we launch would-be Authors and long-time wordsmiths beyond simple idea generation and into the stratosphere of making their stories connect and engage on a deeply meaningful level with their Audience. In fact, we already engaged this key story element by hiding it within one of our stories in this series. Read on to find the location of this special Narrative First Easter Egg.
In the past, we downplayed the "cruciality" of this element.
Sounds pretty important, right? Turns out the Crucial Element isn't as crucial to the formation of a story as you would think. It simply marks the element that exists at the intersection of the Objective Story Throughline and Main Character Throughline. Crucial to the storyform, but not crucial to implementation of that storyform. In other words, don't freak out if you don't get it.
And it doesn't help when Chris Huntley, one of the co-creators of the Dramatica theory of story, adds this to the conversation:
When all is said and done, the crucial elements are only ONE of MANY pieces of the storyform. Leaving them out of your story won't ruin the experience for your audience, but adding them does tend to make the story stronger.
After several years of helping clients nail down their narrative structure and seeing the Crucial Element in action in their work and our own, we now believe this concept to be of the utmost importance.
The Crucial Element for a Main Character with a Changed Resolve sits differently across the subjective and objective Throughlines than a Main Character with a Steadfast Resolve. For the most part, the former is easier to understand and integrate.
The Obstacle Character's Crucial Element lies in a dynamic pair relationship with the Main Character's Crucial Element. In other words, in a Changed/Success story the IC Crucial Element would be the same element as the Main Character Solution.
This is easy to see in films like Star Wars or The Matrix or even Monsters, Inc. where the Main Character's personal problem reflects the problem in the larger Objective Story. Luke's problem with challenging himself at every turn, Neo's problem with doubting himself at every turn, and Sully's problem with an instinct to cause children to scream at the top of their lungs showcase problems that once resolved—make it possible for the Objective Story to end in Success.
When it comes to a Changed Main Character and a story that ends in Failure—like Ed Exley in L.A. Confidential or Andy Sachs in The Devil Wears Prada—the Crucial Element plays out in a similar fashion with one slight adjustment. The article The Crucial Element of Screenwriting in Action covers this second scenario in detail.
With the Steadfast Main Character, the Main Character Throughline and Objective Story Throughline find overlap in a somewhat strange and different location:
As with the Changed Main Character, the Obstacle Character's Crucial Element in a Steadfast story lies in a dynamic pair relationship with the Main Character's Crucial Element.[^dynamic]
[^dynamic]: It will be the same element as the Main Character Direction in a Stop story, and the Main Character Focus in a Start story.
While the Changed Main Character looks to the Story Outcome, the Steadfast Character looks to the Main Character Growth. Why? Simply put, in a Changed Main Character story the Main Character Throughline and Objective Story Throughline share the same Problem and Solution elements. In a Steadfast Main Character story the Main Character Throughline and Objective Story Throughline share the same Focus and Direction.
The Crucial Element identifies the location of overlap between the subjective and objective views of a story. When a story abuses or mistakes this connection, the narrative falls flat and seems to lack appropriate drive. When in alignment the narrative thrums like a well-tuned engine. Two recent movies exemplify the latter.
And, of course, our Western Occult story from last week's article Finding Your Own Unique Voice When Writing for Nanowrimo applied the Crucial Element correctly.
Surprise!
Moana tells the story of a Steadfast Main Character who holds out for other to Stop doubting her (Main Character Resolve of Steadfast, Main Character Growth of Stop). The quad of problematic character elements in the Objective Story Throughline finds the Objective Story Focus of Free, the Objective Story Direction of Control, and the Objective Story Solution of Pursuit.
Referring to the above for application of the Crucial Element in a Steadfast Main Character story, we find that Moana's MC Crucial Element lies in Free and Maui's IC Crucial Element lies in Control.
Remember that in a Steadfast story, the Focus and Direction elements of the Main Character and Objective Story Throughline are one and the same. For reference, here is Moana's quad of problematic elements in her own personal Throughline.
At first glance it may seem as if these elements are reversed. If anything, Maui is the character who runs "free" of responsibilities, while Moana is the one who "takes control" and sets a course of action straight to Te Kā. Why then does Dramatica call for these roles to be switched?
Hacksaw Ridge is another story focused on a Steadfast Main Character that manages to hold out for those around him to Stop telling him how to live his life. The quad of problematic character elements in this WWII drama finds the Objective Story Problem in Pursuit, the Objective Story Focus in Control, the Objective Story Direction in Free, and the Objective Story Solution in Avoid.
Basically, the exact 180-flip of Moana's thematic issues.
Again, we find that it appears Dramatica incorrectly reverses the Crucial Elements for these characters. Private Doss is the one advocating for freedom, or Free behavior. Pvt. Smitty, Sgt. Howell, and Captain Glover clearly exemplify traits of Control in their efforts to dictate what Doss can and cannot do in their Army.
And that's when you need to realize that the character elements found in the Objective Story Throughline represent facets of the Storymind as a whole--NOT individual character traits to be doled out as if at the start of a Dungeons & Dragons campaign.
Dramatica sees story as an analogy to a single human mind trying to solving a problem. Protagonist, Antagonist, Skeptic, Guardian, Sidekick--these characters stand in for aspects of the mind at work. The Protagonist represents our motivation for initiative, the Antagonist our motivation for reticence.
When building characters by dragging and dropping avatars in the Build Character window, the Author assigns facets of the mind at work to these individual players. Thinking individual traits describe these characters is inaccurate; rather these characters represent individual traits of a single mind in the process of solving a problem. Understand this simple, but powerful concept, and Dramatica's "reversal" of objective character elements in Moana and Hacksaw Ridge becomes clear.
As a Steadfast Main Character, Moana identifies the element in the environment that must be shifted in order for the Objective Story Solution to take place. She points out the "free-ness" in others, because she herself advocates for freedom (her song, "How Far I'll Go" says as much). Likewise with Pvt. Doss in Hacksaw Ridge--Desmond identifies this problem of Control and shifts it out of the environment and into everyone else's concept of themselves.
In a story with a Steadfast Main Character, the most significant paradigm shift occurs within the Obstacle Character--and this shift initiates with the Main Character's constant prodding of the Main Character's Crucial Element. Maui would never have reached a point of going after something if Moana had not constantly hit upon the Demigod's predilection for thinking himself in "control" of everything. In fact, this narrative aspect could have been made more meaningful had the Authors emphasized and made a bigger deal out of Maui running away from the Coconut Pygmies and the Coconut Crab by playing up his need to always be in the driver's seat of his life..
The collective Obstacle Characters of Smitty, Howell, and Glover would never have reached that point where they actually delay and put off an attack (another way of saying Avoid) had it not been for Desmond's constant example and living proof over how much Control we truly have over our lives. Instead of writing a "reserved and controlled" character one might assume Dramatica calls for by giving Desmond this Crucial Element, the Authors of Hacksaw Ridge naturally saw to it that Des offered this aspect of the Storymind up for consideration to the Audience.
In last week's article on our Western Occult story, I secretly wove the Crucial Element into the world views of the Main Character and Obstacle Character:
To him [Jack, our Obstacle Character], it doesn't make sense to get on your knees and pray for something you don't even need. Be grateful and keep yourself from praying for an impossibility...Abby [our Main Character] sits on the other side of the argument. Why should they be happy with what they have when it feels so bad to have so little?
Our story features a Steadfast Main Character as well, however Abby's Main Character Growth differs from Moana and Pvt. Doss in that she is holding out for something to Start. The Main Character's Crucial Element will therefore be the same as the Objective Story Direction. With a Steadfast/Start story the emphasis is on the hole to be filled in order to clear the way for the Objective Story Solution to come into play, so a focus on the Direction makes sense. That Direction, or hole to be filled, in our story is Feeling.
Do you see how I worked in her prodding of Feelings? How about Jack's counter of what "makes sense"? That's another way of encoding his Crucial Element of Logic.
Abby isn't an emotional character given to bouts of intense depression or manic excitement as one would expect if these were simply character traits. Rather, she singles out the lack of feelings or deficient feelings that Jack and the others need to find within themselves. That shift, while clearing the way for the possibility of the townspeople to finally acquire some control over their lives, simply isn't enough to overcome their addiction to being loose and fancy free. Remember, our story ends in Failure. Abby's prodding works as intended in terms of freeing up Jack's emotional growth, yet it isn't enough to overcome the story's larger problem.
Audiences want to be inspired; they want to learn something new about their world that they can then take with them on their own journey. Understanding where the objective and subjective points-of-view of your story crossover can go a long way towards ensuring that your efforts at the keypad or at the notepad will not go unnoticed.
The Crucial Element of a story is crucial because it pinpoints an impossibility of life only possible within a narrative. An Author communicates this meaningful reality by accurately assigning the correct element to the two major subjective characters of a story--the Main Character and the Obstacle Character.
In the end, we write to be personally understood. We all have a unique and wonderful way of seeing the world and we hope to wish that someone somewhere hears our heart's voice. Embrace the concept of the Storymind by giving your Audience a clear and accurate mind to inhabit and Audiences everywhere will ultimately embrace you.
Don't miss out on the latest in narrative theory and storytelling with artificial intelligence. Subscribe to the Narrative First newsletter below and receive a link to download the 20-page e-book, Never Trust a Hero.