Busting the fear-mongering myths
In an era where artificial intelligence is rapidly evolving, there's a palpable buzz around its impact on creativity and storytelling. OpenAI's recent article sheds light on the future of AI, emphasizing training as fair use, and the diligent efforts to curb the rare instances of "regurgitation" by AI models. As a creative professional who's recently embraced Bluesky, I've navigated through the whirlwind of opinions, even creating an “Anti-AI Crowd” list to mute the chaos and focus on the potential of these advancements.
The key takeaway from OpenAI's stance is clear: training AI models with publicly available internet materials is not only fair use but also vital for innovation and competitiveness. This principle is widely supported across various sectors, reaffirming the ethical and legal standing of AI development. Similarly, the commitment to a simple opt-out process for publishers like The New York Times exemplifies responsible AI citizenship.
In the context of Subtxt, this development is particularly exciting. Subtxt, a platform dedicated to helping writers uncover the true meaning of their stories and develop them efficiently, aligns perfectly with the ethos of responsible AI use in creativity. The AI models aren't designed to plagiarize or mimic but to learn from a vast array of human knowledge and apply these concepts to assist in new creative problems.
This approach mirrors human education, where we learn from a diverse set of information to apply to new situations. In storytelling, this means an AI can offer insights and guidance based on a broad understanding of narrative structures, themes, and character development, without lifting directly from existing sources.
Interestingly, the concern of "regurgitation" is a rare bug, much like human error in learning and creativity. OpenAI's commitment to reducing this to zero reflects the continuous evolution of AI towards more nuanced and responsible creativity assistance. This is a far cry from the fear-mongering around AI stealing or copying content. Instead, it's about learning from the collective human experience to offer unique and helpful perspectives.
As a user of Subtxt, this development is not just reassuring but invigorating. The tool’s ability to harness AI for enhancing storytelling aligns with the future that OpenAI envisions--one where AI aids in the creative process responsibly and innovatively. The discussions about AI's role in creativity have often been mired in misconceptions and fears, but with clear policies and ethical practices, there's a path forward that respects creators while fostering innovation.
The lawsuit by The New York Times, while a point of contention, also highlights the importance of clear communication and understanding in this new landscape. It’s a reminder that as we navigate these uncharted waters, dialogue and collaboration are key.
In conclusion, at Narrative First and in our use of Subtxt, we're not just observing this new world of AI-enhanced creativity; we're actively participating in it. With responsible use and an understanding of the principles of fair use, we're excited about the endless possibilities that AI brings to storytelling and creativity. The future is here, and it's filled with potential for storytellers and creatives alike.
(PS: Here's the link to that Anti-AI Crowd list in Bluesky)
Don't miss out on the latest in narrative theory and storytelling with artificial intelligence. Subscribe to the Narrative First newsletter below and receive a link to download the 20-page e-book, Never Trust a Hero.